Re: [SKOS]: [ISSUE 44] BroaderNarrowerSemantics

Hi Quentin

Just a doubt your comment raise: does your first comment's being based 
on the Primer means that you're not happy with the hints for 
specialization that are present in section 4.7 of [2]?

Antoine
> Hi all,
>
> The comments below are based on my review [1] of the SKOS primer [2],
> but are quite relevant to this thread.
>
> 1. SKOS primer [2] describes that skos:broader and skos:narrower can be
> used to create links "between one whole and its parts". This
> representation would allow many different type of hierarchies to be
> created without formally defining these differences. In same
> applications, this would be totally acceptable. However, in some case
> could raise interoperability issues. I like the ideas suggested in [3]
> and [4], where sub-properties are created to represent different
> aspects.  
>
> 2. I would agree with Margherita [5] to use skos:hasBroader and
> skos:hasNarrower to remove any confusion about the intended meaning of
> the property for people that are not used to convention in thesaurus
> circles (e.g. BS8723-2, para.8.3.1).
>
> Quentin
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0078.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/DraftPrimer
> [3]
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/thes/1.0/guide/20040504/#3.9
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/extensions/spec/
> [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0075.html
>
> ******************************************
> * Quentin H. Reul                        *
> * PhD Research Student                   *
> * Department of Computing Science        *
> * University of Aberdeen, King's College *
> * Room 238 in the Meston Building        *
> * ABERDEEN AB24 3UE                      *
> * Phone: +44 (0)1224 27 4485             *
> * http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~qreul       *
> ******************************************
>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 14:48:52 UTC