Hi Quentin Just a doubt your comment raise: does your first comment's being based on the Primer means that you're not happy with the hints for specialization that are present in section 4.7 of [2]? Antoine > Hi all, > > The comments below are based on my review [1] of the SKOS primer [2], > but are quite relevant to this thread. > > 1. SKOS primer [2] describes that skos:broader and skos:narrower can be > used to create links "between one whole and its parts". This > representation would allow many different type of hierarchies to be > created without formally defining these differences. In same > applications, this would be totally acceptable. However, in some case > could raise interoperability issues. I like the ideas suggested in [3] > and [4], where sub-properties are created to represent different > aspects. > > 2. I would agree with Margherita [5] to use skos:hasBroader and > skos:hasNarrower to remove any confusion about the intended meaning of > the property for people that are not used to convention in thesaurus > circles (e.g. BS8723-2, para.8.3.1). > > Quentin > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0078.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/DraftPrimer > [3] > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/thes/1.0/guide/20040504/#3.9 > [4] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/extensions/spec/ > [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0075.html > > ****************************************** > * Quentin H. Reul * > * PhD Research Student * > * Department of Computing Science * > * University of Aberdeen, King's College * > * Room 238 in the Meston Building * > * ABERDEEN AB24 3UE * > * Phone: +44 (0)1224 27 4485 * > * http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~qreul * > ****************************************** > > > >Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 14:48:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 January 2008 14:48:54 GMT