- From: Jon Phipps <jphipps@madcreek.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:37:38 -0500
- To: SWD Working SWD <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, Diego Berrueta <diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org>, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Hi Ed, Ralph, Based on your feedback and discussion, here's our proposed list of pre-publish changes: BTW Ralph, In recipe 6, rather than the main doc providing any specific references to "pre-existing libraries" supporting conneg, would you be willing to setup yet another wiki page where references to such libraries could be maintained? 1. Change... [[[While the provided Recipes are specific to an Apache HTTP server, the general principles apply to non-Apache environments as well.]]] to... [[[While the provided configuration examples are specific to an Apache HTTP server, the general principles apply to non-Apache environments as well.]]] 2. Change... [[[The editors wish to extend an invitation to any and all to submit additional bindings for non-Apache servers. The W3C is providing a wiki page to collect these bindings and recommendations. @@TODO Where is this wiki page?]]] to... [[[The Working Group invites contributions of additional bindings for non-Apache servers. The W3C has provided a wiki page to collect these <a href="http://esw.w3.org/topic/VocabPublishingRecipes">non-Apache bindings and recommendations</a>.]]] 3. Slightly expand the discussion of the IE hack to explain what we mean by 'strange' and show an actual comparison of the headers 4. Change [[[DBPL]]] where it appears in the text to [[[DBLP]]] 5. In recipe 6, rather than provide any specific references to "pre- existing libraries" supporting conneg, we'd like Ralph to setup another wiki page which we'll reference. 6. Add reference to pubby in the case studies in recipe 6. 7. Make all of Ralph's suggested changes. (whew!) 8. Let's leave the example namespace alone for now, changing it to w3.org when the examples can be made to work correctly in that namespace. 9. We propose that we don't change the ordering. 10. Let's not simplify or remove the 'a' recipes. We are (mostly) pleased with their existence and current location. Cheers, Jon & Diego
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 14:37:52 UTC