I do not think that creating the sub-properties skos:broaderTransitive and skos:narrowerTransitive makes SKOS too complex. I don't think we need much more hierarchy in the relations than that. Daniel At 09:34 AM 1/14/2008, Sini, Margherita (KCEW) wrote: >I do not really like the solution of creating new sub-properties >skos:broaderTransitive and skos:narrowerTransitive and make them transitive, >because this means we may need to have many other cases, and this may go >agains the "simplicity" we mention is good to keep in SKOS. But if any >specification should be done, this is the correct way to go, I agree.Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 02:44:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 15 January 2008 02:44:47 GMT