Thanks for that clarification Ralph. My review was in fact based on a reading of the Dec 3rd draft. My apologies for the confusion, //Ed On Jan 8, 2008 1:47 PM, Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org> wrote: > At 11:30 AM 1/8/2008 -0500, Ed Summers wrote: > > >Below is my (late) review of the Best Practice Recipes for Publishing > >RDF Vocabularies [1]. > > Ed, just confirming that you reviewed the 3 December editor's > draft [2] that is intended to be the update and not the published > WD that you cited ([1]). (You referred to the editor's note on > pre-existing libraries, which appears only in the editor's draft, > so I'm reasonably confident that you did :) > > I just noticed that the wiki [3] had not had a link to the editor's > draft that Jon posted in December [4]. It does now have that link. > > >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/ > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/draft-20071203 > [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#Recipes > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Dec/0006.html > >Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:13:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:13:35 GMT