- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:12:24 +0100
- To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Dear all, About the action > ACTION: Antoine to propose a resoltuion for ISSUE 54 by next telecon Initially, issue-54 ConceptSemantics [1] is formulated in a vague way: > skos:Concept is currently declared as { skos:Concept rdf:type rdfs:Class . } ... > is this ok? Is this enough? What about the OWL universe? My preparation for Amsterdam F2F included two aspects [2]: 1. Giving semantics to skos:Concept 2. Bridging SKOS modelling with OWL modelling With respect to the first point, section 3 of SKOS reference [3] gives enough material, for instance: - skos:Concept is an instance of owl:Class. - there can be resources that are both skos:Concept and owl:Class The problem is that we still lack material for the second point. The above mentioned section 3 reads: > For more information on recommended design patterns for working with > SKOS in combination with OWL, see appendix D > <http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/#skos-owl-patterns>. while appendix D [4] is not written yet. However, appendix D refers to ISSUE-80 SKOS-OWL-Patterns [5], which has been raised by alistair. It seems indeed that the point 2 of ISSUE-54 mentioned above can be treated in the context of ISSUE-80. I therefore propose the WG to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION: Section 3 of the SKOS reference is adopted as a partial solution to ISSUE-54. ISSUE-54 is CLOSEd. ISSUE-80 is now OPENed Best, Antoine [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/54 [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ConceptSemantics [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/#L1289 [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/#skos-owl-patterns [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/80
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2008 19:13:23 UTC