Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-157]

Hmm, I responded personally because I seem to remember that I made both
personal and WG comments.  I don't expect any different response from
the WG, but I'll try to get the WG's attention quickly on this.

Ian/Alan:  Can we put this on the agenda for next week's call?

peter


From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-157]
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:07:15 +0000

> 
> On 10 Dec 2008, at 21:51, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> >
> > These all appear to be reasonable responses, personally.
> 
> Peter
> 
> I note your wording here. Should we also expect an official response
> from the WG, or can we consider this issue dealt with?
> 
> 	Sean

Received on Thursday, 11 December 2008 13:26:28 UTC