Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-154]

OK by me.

peter


From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-154]
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:55:53 +0000

> 
> On 3 Nov 2008, at 20:25, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> >
> > I would be minimally satisfied if the RDF/XML document that embodies the
> > OWL portion of the SKOS semantics were to have comments (or SKOS
> > comments) in it that referred back to the semantic sections of the SKOS
> > document, as in
> >
> > <!-- S1  	skos:Concept is an instance of owl:Class.  -->
> > <owl:Class rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos#Concept">
> >   <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Concept</rdfs:label>
> >   <skos:changeNote>
> >     <rdf:Description>
> >       <rdf:value>Initial description.</rdf:value>
> >       <dc:creator>Sean Bechhofer</dc:creator>
> >       <dc:date>2008-05-xx</dc:date>
> >     </rdf:Description>
> >   </skos:changeNote>
> >   <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos"/>
> >   <skos:definition xml:lang="en">An abstract idea or notion; a unit of thought.</skos:definition>
> >   <dct:issued>2008-05-xx</dct:issued>
> > </owl:Class>
> 
> Peter
> 
> The latest version of the SKOS scheme:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20081001/skos.rdf
> 
> now has comments as requested above. There is also a comment in the header outlining those conditions that are not explicitly captured in the schema. I hope this is satisfactory.
> 
> The schema will reside at the appropriate URI in the fullness of time.
> 
> 	Sean
> 
> --
> Sean Bechhofer
> School of Computer Science
> University of Manchester
> sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk
> http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 8 December 2008 18:22:13 UTC