The resolution to 153 and 175 results in us using the original SKOS namespace. I don't believe we have discussed the XL namespace in detail. Should we move XL under 2004/02, e.g. http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/xl or leave it as is? Sean -- Sean Bechhofer School of Computer Science University of Manchester sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhoferReceived on Thursday, 4 December 2008 17:45:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 4 December 2008 17:45:38 GMT