Hi Simon, > This would be really great. As it says in the document , something > that almost fits into OWL 2 may be possible now. Sean's schema [1] may fit into OWL 2.0 as is. If so, would that be good enough? Btw I just did some checking, to make the schema fit into OWL DL (1.0) we would have to remove all the annotation triples using either SKOS or DC properties in the predicate position, which doesn't affect the semantics but does remove some potentially useful documentation. We would also have to remove the triple skos:memberList rdfs:range rdf:List (because rdf:List is in the OWL disallowed vocabulary). Cheers, Alistair. [1] <http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb/SKOS/schema/20080429/core.turtle> > > Cheers, > Simon > > > Cheers, > > > > Alistair. > > > > > > > >> > >> Sean > >> > >> -- > >> Sean Bechhofer > >> School of Computer Science > >> University of Manchester > >> sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk > >> http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Simon Jupp > simon.jupp@manchester.ac.uk > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~sjupp/ > > >Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:38:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:39:00 GMT