- From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:10:06 +0100
- To: Daniel Rubin <rubin@med.stanford.edu>
- Cc: Quentin Reul <qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
On 27 Sep 2007, at 19:28, Daniel Rubin wrote: > I strongly believe that the semantics of all relations in SKOS are > musb be *consistent*--if this isn't the case, then users who want > to use SKOS terminologies/ontologies for reasoning will not be able > to do so. This is similar to the importance of every class in SKOS > having a single definition. If the semantics of relations and > meanings of classes are context-dependent, then those context > dependencies need to be incorporated in SKOS. Daniel I'm afraid I'm not sure I understand what you mean by consistent here. Sean -- Sean Bechhofer School of Computer Science University of Manchester sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
Received on Friday, 28 September 2007 13:10:03 UTC