[SKOS] Decisions on Concept Scheme issues

Hi,

About
> *[NEW]* *ACTION:* Antoine to list decisions made about concept scheme 
> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/23-swd-minutes.html#action13]
which overlaps a lot with Guus' action
> *[NEW]* *ACTION:* Guus to post an interpretation of the Amsterdam 
> discussion of isDefinedBy [recorded in 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/23-swd-minutes.html#action14]

We have in the following from http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html


> ... proposal is to accept the proposal from alistair as a resolution 
> for closing issue 36
(Alistair's proposal at 
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ConceptSchemes/MinimalProposal?action=recall&rev=1) 

> ... with two remarks
>
> 1. for historical reasons, inscheme is kept as a subprop of isDefinedBy
>
> 2. we dont touch hasTopConcept
>
> al: are we explicitly depracating skos:inScheme
>
> danbri: precedents for deprecation?
>
> al: in prev WG we useed OWLs classes for these
>
> danbri: i suggest doing likewise here
>
> guus: formalities
> ... no objections, abstentions
> ... resolved by consensus
>
> we agree 3. that deprecating skos:inScheme (using approporiate owl 
> vocab) is part of the accepted proposal

So I think this is pretty explicit, even if the third part (which I'm 
not really fond of, but that's another story) has been added in a 
strange way.

Antoine