- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:52:37 +0200
- To: "Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- CC: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Alistair, The difference I see between the two proposals is the the Bundle proposal provides a larger similarity between specifying the ordered and unordered collections. I do't see any other conceptual differences. Is this a correct observation? Thanks, Guus Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is an alternative proposal for resolution of ISSUE-33: GroupingConstructs [1] ... > > <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/GroupingConstructs/ProposalTwo?action=recall&rev=5> > > I prefer this one over the "Minimal Fix" proposal [2], although there are some details in the algorithm, which both proposals use, which need to be worked out. We'll probably need some test cases before we can make a decision on this issue. > > Cheers, > > Alistair. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/33 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/GroupingConstructs/ProposalTwo > > > -- > Alistair Miles > Research Associate > Science and Technology Facilities Council > Rutherford Appleton Laboratory > Harwell Science and Innovation Campus > Didcot > Oxfordshire OX11 0QX > United Kingdom > Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman > Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk > Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 > -- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Computer Science De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands T: +31 20 598 7739/7718; F: +31 84 712 1446 Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 14:53:04 UTC