- From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:03:41 +0100
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
On 26 Jun 2007, at 09:43, Antoine Isaac wrote: >> >>> But of course in some contexts a SKOS implementation could denote >>> tools making use of SKOS (e.g. browser). Perhaps we should use >>> 'SKOS tools' to refer to the latter category. >> >> Pinning down vocabulary is an excellent idea. I like the use of >> "tools" for browsers and the like. I'm not sure that I'd use the >> word "implementation" for an instantiation of the SKOS model >> though -- implementation to me has different connotations. > I agree with trying to avoid the use of 'implementation'. But is > 'instantiation' clear enough for the creation of SKOS concept schemes? I'm not sure. I propose that we put this on the agenda for a short discussion during next week's call (to give us some time to think about it). Sean -- Sean Bechhofer School of Computer Science University of Manchester sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 09:16:24 UTC