W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 09:58:56 -0700
Message-ID: <46926950.2090504@adida.net>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>

Ivan Herman wrote:
> Hm. That is not what I meant. My impression is that
> http://www.w3.org/mid/46900890.3030500@adida.net
> means that @the_attribute_that_shall_not_be_named, usually, refers to
> the subject but, in some cases, to the object...

Right, so that's the case we're talking about for IMG, where if you use
@class (or whatever it becomes), then that applies to @src, just like it
would apply to @href. Am I missing your point/objection?

And Shane's comment is exactly right: @src is about embedding, @href is
about linking, but really they should probably function very similarly
in RDFa.

Received on Monday, 9 July 2007 16:59:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:50 UTC