Antoine Isaac wrote: [..] > Do you mean that proper solution for ISSUE-36 on ConceptScheme > containment (http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/36) would help > you remove your objection? I have the feeling somehow that we are > argueing over the use of BT as mapping links between different > vocabularies because we don't have a solution for ISSUE-36 (and, I > agree, this one might be hard to find). which bothers me a bit because > these problems seems to me slightly orthogonal... About ISSUE -36 (although it is officially not open): I must admit that I have given up on solving this problem (which reoccurs in many forms) at the RDF/OWL level (as it currently stands). All RDF/OWL tools I use work with some form of naming a graph (typically through a quadruple instead of a triple format). I don't think this working group should try and solve this problem. I therefore propose to POSTPONE this issue and indicate in our spec a text indicating how users are expected to solve this at the tool level. Guus [..] -- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Computer Science De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands T: +31 20 598 7739/7718; F: +31 84 712 1446 Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2007 22:34:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:29 GMT