W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > January 2007

RE: Status of (and possible resurrection of) Semantic InteroperabilityNote

From: Uschold, Michael F <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:21:39 -0800
Message-ID: <4301AFA5A72736428DA388B73676A3810538635E@XCH-NW-6V1.nw.nos.boeing.com>
To: "Elisa F. Kendall" <ekendall@sandsoft.com>, "Chris Menzel" <cmenzel@tamu.edu>
Cc: "Deborah McGuinness" <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>


I'm on vacation from tomorrow, returning on 19 Feb.
Also, I have no budget for this activity, I need to do it on my own

I would like to have it published in the SWD if possible, given it is
scheduled as a deliverable.


Michael Uschold
M&CT, Phantom Works 
425 373-2845

COOL TIP: to skip the phone menu tree and get a human on the phone, go
to: http://gethuman.com/tips.html 

-----Original Message-----
From: Elisa F. Kendall [mailto:ekendall@sandsoft.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 4:07 PM
To: Uschold, Michael F; Chris Menzel
Cc: Deborah McGuinness; SWD WG
Subject: Status of (and possible resurrection of) Semantic

Hi Mike & Chris,

I took an action item during the SWD F2F today to contact you both
regarding (1) your intentions on finalizing the note to at least WD
status, and (2) the potential for joining the SWD working group to
facilitate completion / publication.  I've already committed to
co-editing another note, but think this one is also important, that
significant effort has already been invested by you on it, and would
like to see it get cleaned up and published.  We've talked about this
informally a couple of times, but we should either get moving on it
again or decide to drop it from the SWD set of deliverables.

I'm willing to help and to co-edit if that would facilitate the process.
Let us know when you have a moment to think about it.


Received on Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:23:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:48 UTC