W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > February 2007

terms as classes: the WordNet example

From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:40:58 +0100
Message-ID: <45E46D2A.9000609@cs.vu.nl>
To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>

As background for the ongoing discussion I would 
like to point to the RDF/OWL representation of 
WordNet [1], where the "term-as-class" approach 
was taken. I think it is good choice there, 
because WordNet is a linguistic resource and 
therefore needs to represent a lot of lexical 
detail. However, you can also see from this 
document that it involves quite a lot of work, for 
example choosing/creating URIs for terms, which 
can be nontrivial. This WordNet experience makes 
me a bit  careful to go down this road with SKOS. 
However, I don't want to imply it is an impossible 
route to take.

Guus

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/wordnet-rdf/



-- 
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
T: +31 20 598 7739/7718; F: +31 84 712 1446
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2007 17:41:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:28 GMT