W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: [SKOS] OWL DL compatibility

From: Daniel Rubin <rubin@med.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:43:38 -0800
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20070220174203.04877100@med.stanford.edu>
To: Alistair Miles <a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk>,SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>

Hi Alistair,
I like this document--this is getting to important issues. With 
respect to SKOS lexical labelling properties, I believe these should 
be typed as annotation properties. Is there any consensus on this issue?
Daniel

At 10:29 AM 2/20/2007, Alistair Miles wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I tried to illustrate some of the issues relating to SKOS and OWL DL 
>compatibility, see:
>
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/OwlCompatibility?action=recall&rev=7
>
>ACTION: Alistair to rephrase the old issue of skos/owl-dl 
>coexistence and semantics [recorded in 
>http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action08]
>--done
>
>Cheers,
>
>Alistair.
>
>--
>Alistair Miles
>Research Associate
>CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
>Building R1 Room 1.60
>Fermi Avenue
>Chilton
>Didcot
>Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
>United Kingdom
>Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman
>Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
>Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 01:43:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:28 GMT