- From: Simone Onofri <simone.onofri@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:45:00 +0100
- To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, public-swd-wg@w3.org
On 2/20/07, Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at> wrote: > Welcome back to work to our US comrades! > > Looking at Tom Morris presentation at BarCamp London 2 [1] > raises the question, why - still - RDFa is denounced to be XHTML 2-only > :( > > I would like to trigger a 'RDFa PR campaign' to inform SW developers > that RDFa is available with XHTML 1.1, already. Thanks Michael, Ben, Guus, Dan, Of course, on RDFa Primer [1] - we can read: [[ RDFa is a syntax that accomplishes this metadata expression using a set of elements and attributes that embed RDF in XHTML. An important goal of RDFa is to achieve this RDF embedding without repeating existing XHTML content when that content is the metadata. Though RDFa was initially designed for XHTML2, one should be able to use RDFa with other XML dialects, e.g. XHTML1, SVG, given proper schema additions. ]] The support for XHTML 1.1 using the Metadata Module [2] should be explained more clearly? So when module will'be ready on a dedicated paragraph? With Ben Adida we discussed on this integration [3] and following also original discussion on GRDDL list on integrating Semantic Layer on XHTML page [4]. Well, regarding PR anyone (I if You like) can also try to update the current definition also on Wikipedia [5] to explicit the XHTML 1.1 modularization question. Also writing article can be a fine way to define the rela potential of RDFa, not only XHTML 2.0 (also 1.1). Have a fine day, Simone [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-primer/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-meta.html#s_metamodule [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Feb/0049.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0065.html [5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDFa
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 20:45:08 UTC