Le 15 févr. 2007 à 12:21, Mike Schinkel a écrit : > Karl Dubost wrote: >> Longer: Microformats call it "Unique Root Class Names". To >> avoid name clashes in software implementing microformats >> scrapping, they have to be sure to scope the right >> microformat. The switching mechanism >> (namespace) is a root class name which is nesting the other >> class values.[2] So it is a "namespace", microformats just do >> not call it a namespace. > > I hate to be a contrarian, oooh but I'm not saying that there is no issue ;) with the unique root class names. > but I've brought up the issue of disambiguation > on the Microformats list and discussed it at length, and IMO they > are not > willing to address the issue with any level of realism [1]. been there, done that. :) -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 03:43:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:28 GMT