W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: more SKOS requirements

From: Daniel Rubin <rubin@med.stanford.edu>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:37:16 -0800
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20070211113622.047e94c0@med.stanford.edu>
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Cc: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>

Hi Antoine,
I added the OBI metadata requirements to the corresponding case description.
I also posted my edited UCR for Radlex.
Daniel

At 10:30 AM 2/10/2007, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>Hi Daniel,
>
>>
>>
>>A few of the communities I've been working with for SKOS use cases 
>>have come together to identify a set of metadata elements they need 
>>to be associated with terms in their published terminologies. I 
>>feel these should be considered for additional SKOS requirements.
>
>The metadata elements you give are indeed now considered (at least 
>the general categories they belong to) in the candidate requirement 
>list, or in the issue list.
>But of course the items there need further definition. Alan has 
>accepted to do some investigation on this:
>
>>ACTION: Alan to write down the general documentation requirements, 
>>in particular to those that are related to literal values, and how 
>>to represent that in skos [recorded in 
>>http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09]
>>ACTION: Alan write up the preferredLabel modelling issue [recorded 
>>in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action01]
>
>
>I think definitively you should collaborate together on that! Your 
>OBI list is a good input. By the way, I think it should appear 
>explicitly in the corresponding case description, shouldn't it?
>
>Thanks for your input,
>
>Antoine
>
>>Thanks
>>Daniel
>>
>>
>>Here is a list of metadata properties and definitions:
>>http://obi.sourceforge.net/ontologyInformation/MinimalMetadata.html
>>
>>This list was compiled over the last months, starting from the
>>RU_metadata.owl, the BirnLex metadata requirements and the metadata
>>annotations provided by the NCIT (all of which can be found on the
>>OBI-Wiki at
>>https://www.cbil.upenn.edu/fugowiki/index.php/RepresentationalUnitMetadataTable). 
>>
>>This minimal subset of metadata properties was agreed upon, and had its
>>definitions finalized by the OBI metadata subgroup during the last two
>>weeks.
>>The added cardinalities are still under discussion, as is the
>>implementation and in some cases the domain of the metadata properties.
>>
>>
Received on Sunday, 11 February 2007 19:37:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:28 GMT