Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa

Ralph R. Swick wrote:
> I am strongly opposed to adding this to the SWD WG agenda.

I agree.

Michael, Mark, I know you are perfectly well intentioned with this
discussion, and that it is, in fact, quite interesting, but I have to
ask that we not go there, even in terms of clarifying language, simply
because this isn't in our scope and we have no time to expand our scope
at this point.

-Ben