- From: Alasdair J G Gray <agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:31:43 +0000
- To: "Sini, Margherita (KCEW)" <Margherita.Sini@fao.org>
- CC: Stella Dextre Clarke <sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk>, Antoine Isaac <Antoine.Isaac@KB.nl>, SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, public-swd-wg@w3.org
Hi, Sini, Margherita (KCEW) wrote: > > By the way, to solve the canyon problem I have also an idea: although > I know that multiple BT are not to be preferred... would anyway be > possible to make a unique term (or concept) "canyon" be related > (whatever the relations is BT, RT...) to both planet and also > satellite? I mean, do not have 2 prefLabels, but have only 1 as there > will be a unique concept... > Just a though... > I agree that one solution would be to declare multiple BT. I did consider this. I have in the end gone for keeping the concepts separate and providing unique prefLabels based on the context. I have provided altLabels so that search can still take advantage of the short label. The main reason for my choice is that we are encoding the vocabulary that someone else devised and they saw fit to distinguish between these two concepts. Cheers, Alasdair -- Dr Alasdair J G Gray http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~agray/ Explicator project http://explicator.dcs.gla.ac.uk/ Office: F161 Tel: +44 141 330 6292 Postal: Computing Science, 17 Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 15:32:42 UTC