W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > November 2006

Re: Frag Ids in location headers

From: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:33:00 +0100
To: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
Cc: Alistair Miles <a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk>, public-swd-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20061128153300.GA1776@sub-tombaker>

Stuart,

On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 05:43:19PM -0000, Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) wrote:
> I'd had a look at the "Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF
> Vocabularies" [1] and was troubled by one small thing in receipe #4. In
> the third diagram [2] does a redirect with a Location header that
> includes a fragment in the redirection. 
> 
> It's not at all clear to me that the http specs allows the inclusion of
> a fragment id in a redirection. I know that the redirections on
> http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title etc. do something similar
> (curiously, the last time I looked there was no 'target' in the
> resulting representation corresponding the location URI
> http://dublincore.org/2006/08/28/dces.rdf#title).

On this last point...:

As written, the recipes in section 4 call for the use of HTML anchors
in the HTML document about the vocabulary, but not for the use of
corresponding targets in the RDF serializations [1].

Tom

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20060314/#recipe4example

-- 
Tom Baker - tbaker@tbaker.de - baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2006 15:33:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:26 GMT