Hi Daniel, > > This looks reasonable (though rather than expect the user community to > fill in the questionnaire, it would be better for the people > collecting the use cases be responsible for gathering the necessary > information). That's an important point to decide on. Of course we are responsible of gathering the UCs, but I don't want to spend my time on sending e-mails that would anyway be similar to the questionnaire. Unless you were thinking about us harvesting application or vocabulary sites and fill in the questionnaire ourselves... > My question though is what we will do with this--exactly how will > responses to these questions drive SKOS requirements? I was expecting > that we collect information about each use case to directly drive > requirements of SKOS. So I was expecting each question to somehow hit > on what exactly needs to be in SKOS, but it's not completely clear to > me in looking at these questions. Maybe something to discuss when we > chat on our tcon. I tried to detail the part about vocabulary description to give hints about such things. I also hope items about versioning and mapping will provide interesting insight on possible requirements. AntoineReceived on Thursday, 23 November 2006 09:57:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:26 GMT