- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:27:38 +0000
- To: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, public-swd-wg@w3.org
Hi Ivan, Thanks for your reply. > > You say "not bound to XHTML2 (any more)", but just for the record, it > > never was. In fact it wasn't even bound exclusively to XHTML--the > > October 2004 draft [1] has samples that use XHTML 1.1 and SVG, and > > even makes reference to using RDFa in SSML. > > > > That is true. Point taken. > > Having said that... the public perception has always been that RDFa was > bound to XHTML2. Whether that is correct or not, this is the way it is, > and my goal was to put things right as of today. I wasn't talking about what other people thought, but what *you* thought. :) Your presentation said that RDFa was no longer bound to XHTML 2, as if at one time it was; you can say that this is what other people incorrectly thought, but that is no reason to repeat the inaccuracy in a presentation...in fact it's every reason to set the record straight! > > You also say "developed in the SW Deployment Working Group", which > > although it's true that RDFa has been worked on there for quite a > > while now, its origin is most definitely the HTML Working Group. > > > > I should have said "is being developed". You are right about history, my > goal was to talk about the status as of today... It wouldn't hurt to mention that it began life in the HTML Working Group, since in may ways it is the only way to understand why it takes the form that it does. Regards, Mark -- Mark Birbeck CEO x-port.net Ltd. e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/ Download our XForms processor from http://www.formsPlayer.com/
Received on Sunday, 12 November 2006 21:27:58 UTC