W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > December 2006

Call for Use Cases: Simple Knowledge Organization Systems (SKOS)

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 17:04:02 +0100
Message-ID: <457ADE72.20309@few.vu.nl>
To: diglib@infoserv.inist.fr, info-ic@listes.irisa.fr
CC: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, NKOS@WWW.DLI2.NSF.GOV

[Apologies for cross-postings. Please forward this mail to anyone 
interested.]

W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group

Call for Use Cases: Simple Knowledge Organization Systems (SKOS)

Are you currently using SKOS, or considering using SKOS in the near 
future? If so, please tell us more by filling in the questionnaire below 
and sending it back to us or to public-swd-wg@w3.org, preferably before 
January 14th, 2007.
The information you provide will be influential in guiding the further 
development of SKOS towards W3C Recommendation status.

We understand that your time is precious, so please don't feel you have 
to answer every question. However, the more information you can provide, 
the easier it will be for the Working Group to understand your 
requirements. Questions marked with an asterix (*) are more important. 
And, of course, please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any 
trouble answering our questions. A FAQ page will be maintained on 
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/UCFAQ, and a description example is 
available at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/ManuscriptsCase.

We are particularly interested in use cases describing the use of 
controlled structured vocabularies in distributed, metadata-driven 
applications. This includes the use of thesauri, classification schemes, 
subject heading systems and taxonomies to facilitate discovery and 
retrieval of information. This also includes situations where two or 
more vocabularies must be "mapped" or "linked" in order to provide 
applications using heterogeneous metadata from different sources.

However, we're not ruling anything out at this stage, and the Working 
Group will carefully consider all submissions we receive.

On behalf of the Working Group, thanks in advance for your time,

Antoine Isaac (aisaac@few.vu.nl), Jon Phipps (jphipps@madcreek.com) and 
Daniel Rubin (dlrubin@stanford.edu)

================================================================
================================================================


Questions marked with an asterix (*) are more important.

================================================================
Section 0. Contact and confidentiality
================================================================

Contact e-mail:

Do you mind your use case being made public on the working group website 
and documents?

================================================================
Section 1. Application
================================================================

In this section we ask you to provide some information about the 
application for which the vocabulary(ies) and or vocabulary mappings are 
being used.

Please note:
-- If your use case does not involve any specific application, but 
consists rather in the description of a specific vocabulary, skip 
straight to Section 2.
-- If your application makes use of links between different 
vocabularies, do not forget to fill in Section 3!

 1.1. What is the title of the application?
 1.2. What is the general purpose of the application?
      What services does it provide to the end-user?

*1.3. Provide some examples of the functionality of the application. Try 
to illustrate all of the functionalities in which the vocabulary(ies) 
and/or vocabulary mappings are involved.

 1.4. What is the architecture of the application?
      What are the main components?
      Are the components and/or the data distributed across a network, 
or across the Web?

 1.5. Briefly describe any special strategy involved in the processing 
of user actions, e.g. query expansion using the vocabulary structure.

 1.6. Are the functionalities associated with the controlled 
vocabulary(ies) integrated in any way with functionalities provided by 
other means? (For example, search and browse using a structured 
vocabulary might be integrated with free-text searching and/or some sort 
of social bookmarking or recommender system.)

 1.7. Any additional information, references and/or hyperlinks.

================================================================
Section 2. Vocabulary(ies)
================================================================

In this section we ask you to provide some information about the 
vocabulary or vocabularies you would like to be able to represent using 
SKOS.

Please note:
-- If you have multiple vocabularies to describe, you may repeat this 
section for each one individually or you may provide a single 
description that encompasses all of your vocabularies.
-- If your use case describes a generic application of one or more 
vocabularies and/or vocabulary mappings, you may skip this section.
-- If your vocabulary case contains cross-vocabulary links (between the 
vocabularies you presented or to external vocabularies), please fill in 
section 3!

 2.1. What is the title of the vocabulary? If you're describing multiple 
vocabularies, please provide as many titles as you can.

 2.2. Briefly describe the general characteristics of the vocabulary, 
e.g. scope, size...

 2.3. In which language(s) is the vocabulary provided?
      In the case of partial translations, how complete are these?

*2.4. Please provide below some extracts from the vocabulary. Use the 
layout or presentation format that you would normally provide for the 
users of the vocabulary. Please ensure that the extracts you provide 
illustrate all of the features of the vocabulary.

 2.5. Describe the structure of the vocabulary.
      What are the main building blocks?
      What types of relationship are used? If you can, provide examples 
by referring to the extracts given in paragraph 2.4.

 2.6. Is a machine-readable representation of the vocabulary already 
available (e.g. as an XML document)? If so, we would be grateful if you 
could provide some example data or point us to a hyperlink.

 2.7. Are any software applications used to create and/or maintain the 
vocabulary?
      Are there any features which these software applications currently 
lack which are required by your use case?

 2.8. If a database application is used to store and/or manage the 
vocabulary, how is the database structured? Illustration by means of 
some table sample is welcome.

 2.9. Were any published standards, textbooks or written guidelines 
followed during the design and construction of the vocabulary?
      Did you decide to diverge from their recommendations in any way, 
and if so, how and why?

 2.10. How are changes to the vocabulary managed?

 2.11. Any additional information, references and/or hyperlinks.

================================================================
Section 3. Vocabulary Mappings
================================================================

In this section we ask you to provide some information about the 
mappings or links between vocabularies you would like to be able to 
represent using SKOS.

Please note:
-- If your use case does not involve vocabulary mappings or links, you 
may skip this section!

 3.1. Which vocabularies are you linking/mapping from/to?

*3.2. Please provide below some extracts from the mappings or links 
between the vocabularies. Use the layout or presentation format that you 
would normally provide for the users of the mappings. Please ensure that 
the examples you provide illustrate all of the different types of 
mapping or link.

 3.3. Describe the different types of mapping used, with reference to 
the examples given in paragraph 3.2.

 3.4. Any additional information, references and/or hyperlinks.
Received on Saturday, 9 December 2006 16:04:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:47 UTC