W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > December 2006

[Fwd: Re: Soliciting input for "Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies"]

From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:25:39 +0100
Message-ID: <45744C03.8050204@cs.vu.nl>
To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
CC: Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Soliciting input for "Best Practice Recipes for 
Publishing RDF Vocabularies"
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 14:45:53 +0000
From: Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>
To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
CC: Semantic web list <semantic-web@w3.org>
References: <45742735.7080401@cs.vu.nl>

Guus, hello.

On 2006 Dec 4 , at 13.48, Guus Schreiber wrote:

> The Semantic Web Deployment Working Group [1, 2] is, amongst other  
> things, chartered to produce a revised and extended version of the  
> "Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies"
> We would welcome input from the community on this, both through  
> comments on the first draft (especially if you've tried to use the  
> recipes) [4] and through people willing to join the SWD group for  
> working on this.

Well, I've used one of the recipes, and it seemed to work 

It seemed to work so successfully that I worry that I'm 
something.  Modulo a couple of @@TODO comments, it's not 
obvious to
me that there's much need for the document to be `revised and
extended'.  One of the advantages of that document is its 
and straightforwardness -- you wouldn't want to compromise that.

Is there an issues list outstanding?

All the best (and thanks for the document),



Norman Gray  /  http://nxg.me.uk
eurovotech.org  /  University of Leicester, UK

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
T: +31 20 598 7739/7718; F: +31 84 712 1446
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/
Received on Monday, 4 December 2006 17:29:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:47 UTC