Re: [SKOS] Re: Comments on "SKOS: requirements for standardization"

Bernard,

> <snip>
> Possibly. The requirements document requests examples of existing use 
> cases that motivate the development of SKOS, not for examples of where 
> SKOS is currently used. Perhaps it's worth considering asking if/how 
> respondents have considered using SKOS to augment/substitute their 
> current vocabularies?

I had in fact thought about that, but I was not sure that this could 
help us defining the use case itself.
Perhaps we could ask something like
"Would you think of a SKOS version co-existing/replacing your current 
representation of the application vocabulary?"

What would people here think of that? My personal opinion is that it is 
rather far from our core concerns, but I would not argue against if 
several people show clear interest for that.

Cheers,

Antoine

Received on Monday, 4 December 2006 11:12:33 UTC