W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > December 2006

Re: [SKOS] Last comments on UC description format

From: Alistair Miles <a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:30:32 +0000
Message-ID: <45701258.1090506@rl.ac.uk>
To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/UCFormat?action=recall&rev=7

Fine by me.

Thanks,

Alistair.

Antoine Isaac wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> I have put on the wiki a filled questionnaire for the current UC format:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/ManuscriptsCase
> 
> FYI, it took me something like 2 hours to complete (it is hard to 
> evaluate, I had to do other things in the meantime): about 30 minutes 
> for application, 1h30 for vocabularies. But notice that there are 2 
> vocabularies, and one of them is not the simplest one can find...
> 
> Antoine
> 
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As discussed in this week's teleconference, the format for describing 
>> use cases should be decided (and sent around) at the beginning of next 
>> week. It would be great if *by monday (2006-12-01)* we have all the 
>> comments of the participants who object to the current proposal 
>> (building on Alistair's proposal), as available at [1]
>>
>> Amongst the concerns I have in mind, a first one is about the 
>> *ordering of the different sections, and the position of questions 
>> concerning mappings (cf. e.g. end of [2])*. I have tried in the 
>> snapshot to solve that by actually keeping it independant, but 
>> mentioned in both Application and Vocabularies sections, in order to 
>> help contributors figure out why they should fill this section. Please 
>> object if the overall chaining of sections/subsections sounds too fuzzy.
>>
>> A second, perhaps much more important one, is the *size and complexity 
>> of the questionnaire*. Some have argued (e.g. [3]) that too complex a 
>> form would deter people for contributing, while others think that on 
>> the contrary a complete form helps contributors, as well as editors of 
>> course. Please say so if you believe the current proposal is not 
>> well-balanced at all!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/UCFormat
>>
>> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0061.html
>>
>> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0047.html
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
Alistair Miles
Research Associate
CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Building R1 Room 1.60
Fermi Avenue
Chilton
Didcot
Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
United Kingdom
Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman
Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
Received on Friday, 1 December 2006 11:30:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:47 UTC