Re: OWL-Time namespace name

That sounds fine to me, Ralph.  Thanks for catching this.

Regards,
Dave


On 27 Sep2006, at 21:36, Ralph R. Swick wrote:

>
> The OWL-Time draft does not explicitly give a namespace URI for
> this ontology.   Reference [8] points to a .owl file in Feng's part
> of the isi.edu URI space.  That file and the linked RDF/XML examples
> use the namespaces
>
>    http://www.isi.edu/~pan/damltime/time.owl#
>    http://www.isi.edu/~pan/damltime/timezone-us.owl#
>
> [8] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/Time-Ontology#ref-8
>
> I don't think the WG really intends those to be the proposed
> namespace names and they probably won't fly with W3C
> namespace naming policy anyway [2].
>
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri
>
> I intend to change these to
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2006/09/time#
>   http://www.w3.org/2006/09/timezone-us#
>
> I hope this is not controversial.  I don't think the reviewers
> noticed this.  I think I may have noticed it last year but I can't
> find evidence that I commented.  I don't know how much
> running code may exist that depends on those damltime URIs.
>
> Please respond quickly if you think we need to discuss this change.
>
> -Ralph
>
>
>