Re: Homework for 9/12 RIF telecon

> At our next telecon, we will spend our time on two main items: the next 
> UCR draft and the extensible design.
>
> For UCR, we will discuss issues 3, 4, 5, 7, 13, all of which have 
> outstanding actions that hopefully will be complete by the telecon.
> We will propose to close issues 9&10
> Issue 6 seems to have been passed over (I don't recall discussion of 
> it), so we will talk about it.
> We will discuss the definition of covers.
> Most importantly, we will work on connecting the existing requirements 
> to the use cases (see 
> [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Sep/0005.html]
>
>
> For the design, Harold has incorporated Peter's proposal with 
> modifications discussed at the last telecon here:
> [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/A.1_Basis%3A_Positive_Conditions]
> We will discuss this and the path forward to the full core language.

I will not be at that tcon (am on holiday) but I wanted to
repeat my remark that too me the condition language can be
like a SPARQL WHERE clause without the GRAPH, OPTIONAL and
FILTER features [1]. Maybe we can add to that the @forSome
and @forAll productions and functional terms can simply be
(fn x1 ... xi).

-- 
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/