W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > September 2006

Re: A Response to Comments

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:24:34 +0900
Message-Id: <54DD5D91-0F85-4597-8261-0488961897A3@w3.org>
Cc: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, w3c-html-wg@w3.org, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>


Le 8 sept. 06 à 11:40, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit :
>> You can still use <cite> in XHTML2. Thus, if you don't care about RDF
>> and want to style a <cite>, you can use the same XHTML and CSS as  
>> before.

==> cite ELEMENT

> The design document argues that "hard-wired" attributes like the  
> cite=''
> attribute are bad design, and instead child elements with  
> externally de-
> fined properties should be used. I pointed out the many problems with
> this approach, which essentially imply that in many cases, RDF/A is  
> much
> worse design, concluding that the assumption that attributes like  
> 'cite'
> are bad design is an assumption that should not have informed the  
> design
> of RDF/A. Whether the cite attribute can still be used is  
> irrelevant to
> my concern.

==> cite ATTRIBUTE

Both participants are not talking about the same things here. ;)



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 03:25:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:22 GMT