- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:14:38 +0900
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Hi,
This is a QA Review comment for "Best Practice Recipes for Publishing
RDF Vocabularies"
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20060314/
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:48:26 GMT
1st WD
In the Content Negotiation section
[[[
Note that where the server is to be configured to perform content
negotiation, a 'default behavior' must be specified. The server must
be able to determine which response should be sent in the case where
the client does not include an 'Accept:' field in the request message
header (i.e. the client doesn't specify a preference), or where the
values of the 'Accept:' field do not match any of the available
content types (i.e. the client asks for something other than RDF/XML
or HTML).
]]]
-- Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20060314/#negotiation
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:48:26 GMT
The second sentence is too long and the paragraph difficult to read.
Suggestion:
"The server must be configured with a “default behavior”
to perform a content negotiation, because sometimes
1. the client does not send an 'Accept:' field in the
request message header i.e. the client doesn't
specify a preference)
2. the client send values of the 'Accept:' field which
do not match any of the available content types
(i.e. the client asks for something other than
RDF/XML or HTML)."
Please, move the note about IE6, or comment about IE6 in a separated
paragraph as an example of implementation problems. Did you test with
other user agents (search engine bots, screen reader, voice reader,
etc.)?
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 15 May 2006 03:14:50 UTC