W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > May 2006

comment: BP Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies - Choosing a Recipe

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:55:18 +0900
Message-Id: <EE7B80F2-CDCF-4A3F-9C79-B30E68036CE6@w3.org>
To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org

Hi,
This is a QA Review comment for "Best Practice Recipes for Publishing
RDF Vocabularies"
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20060314/
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:48:26 GMT
1st WD



"Choosing a recipe"
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20060314/#choosing



This section will benefit from a summary table of all cases, it will  
make the prose lighter by just explaining what are the different cases.
A benefit analysis for each case would be good too.
Why?
When?



	                           hash            slash
                                 namespace        namespace
============================================================
machine processable RDF          recipe 1         recipe 2
        (PURL)                    recipe 1a        recipe 2a
------------------------------------------------------------
RDF and Single HTML document     recipe 3         recipe 4
        (PURL)                    recipe 3a        recipe 4a
------------------------------------------------------------
RDF and Multi HTML documents     recipe 5         recipe 6
        (PURL)                    recipe 5a        recipe 6a
============================================================


Btw there's a typo in the section recipe 5, I think it's "If you are  
using a HASH namespace.



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 15 May 2006 02:55:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:21 GMT