- From: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 14:55:45 +0200
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- CC: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Karl Dubost wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a QA Review comment for "Image Annotation on the Semantic Web"
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-image-annotation-20060322/
> Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:50:45 GMT
> First WD
>
>
> Do you refer to context in this paragraph?
>
> [[[
> Annotating images without having a specific goal or task in mind is
> often not cost effective: after the target application has been
> developed, it turns out that images have been annotated using the
> wrong type of information, or on the wrong abstraction level, etc.
> ]]]
>
> -- Image Annotation on the Semantic Web
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-image-annotation-20060322/#annot_intro
> Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:50:45 GMT
>
>
> "Annotated using the wrong type of information" is not necessary true.
> It always depends on the context. One particular annotation might be
> very useful or completely useless not because of the nature or the
> type of information but because of the context of expressing this
> annotation.
I fully agree. The text now reads:
Annotating images without having a specific context, goal or task
in mind is often not cost effective: after the target application
has been developed, it may turn out that images have been
annotated with information that insufficiently covers the new
requirements.
Please feel free to comment on the new text.
Thanks for spotting this,
Jacco
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2006 12:55:55 UTC