On 30/06/2006 17:28, Pat Hayes wrote: > >> Hi Dan, >> >> Thank you for your comment. The redundant equivalentClass will be >> removed in the >> next edition of the time ontology note. > > This kind of redundancy is quite common in published OWL ontologies, we > have found. Is it an artifact of some ontology composing tool, does > anyone know? I've seen it from Protege. I've assumed it was an idiom for expressing closed classes. Ian -- http://purl.org/NET/iand Blogging at... http://iandavis.com/blog Working on... http://directory.talis.com/Received on Friday, 30 June 2006 17:54:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:22 GMT