Re: status of WNet doc

(sorry for the long delay; it's been a hectic few weeks.)

At 05:50 PM 6/2/2006 +0300, Mark van Assem wrote:
>Hi Ralph,
>
>The following URI in the Draft [1] gets me a "We're sorry but the link you tried to access is forbidden."
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/instances/wordsense-bank-noun-1

yep, there are a bunch of those CBDs that do not have the correct
access control.  We're working on how to most easily fix that.

The specific one(s) mentioned in the document are now fixed.

>For the following URI I get a "sorry not found"
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/schema/participleOf
>
>We probably did not think about providing CBDs for the schema entities. Should we?

not CBDs, just use the full schema as it's small. I made all the
Properties and Classes defined in the wnfull and wnbasic schemas
be recognized.  I used recipe 4 [1] of "Best Practice Recipes for
Publishing RDF Vocabularies" though I haven't created an HTML
variant.  I also arranged that undefined Properties and Classes are 404.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/#recipe4

Received on Monday, 19 June 2006 16:06:17 UTC