Is this it? http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#h-6.12 If so, http://svn.rdflib.net/trunk/ revision *784* has a fix for those (and so does my website http://torrez.us/rdfa). -Elias Elias Torres wrote: > Do you mean I have to read the HTML spec too? ;-) > > I just read the RDFa syntax document and did my best to parse it out. > I guess I'll look for reserved HTML rel values and ignore those. Any > other gotchas? > > -Elias > > On 6/8/06, Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu> wrote: >> >> >> On Jun 8, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: >> >> > I was assuming, quite dangerously, that Elias's code to implement >> > RDFa is correct. I now understand that it's not quite there yet. >> >> More importantly, the proposal I've made is not quite there yet :) >> >> Elias's code is actually quite far along, but we haven't spec'ed the >> default XHTML hGRDDL, so I take full responsibility for this gap >> >> I do have strong hope that hGRDDL will help the various metadata- >> embedding communities bridge many of the differences between the >> various schemes (and I'm open other names than hGRDDL, btw, if you or >> others feel that it doesn't fit.) >> >> -Ben >> >> >Received on Thursday, 8 June 2006 22:29:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:22 GMT