- From: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:05:45 -0500
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, "Miles, AJ ((Alistair))" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, "Booth, David ((HP Software - Boston))" <dbooth@hp.com>
- Cc: SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
The [1] reference was meant to point to: [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2006-01-24-rdfa-primer -Ben On Jan 27, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Ben Adida wrote: > > > [... much useful discussion ...] > > Thank you all for these very useful comments. I have added warnings > in Sections 2 and 3 of the RDF/A Primer (2006-01-24) [1]. > > I would like to ask for some clarification on one issue so we can > narrow down the source of the debate. I'm particularly worried > about the implication that a URI with a # in it cannot be used to > reference a non-information-resource entity if the containing URI > (without a #) is an XHTML document. > > Specifically, here's an alternative way to present the FOAF > metadata in RDF/A: > > ========= > <html> > <head><title>Ben Adida's Page</title></head> > <body> > <p about="#me"> > Welcome to my <a rel="foaf:homepage">homepage</a>. > You can contact me at <span property="foaf:mbox">ben@mit.edu</span>. > </p> > </body> > </html> > ========= > > which would yield the triples: > > <#me> foaf:homepage <>. > <#me> foaf:mbox "ben@mit.edu". > > Is this still wrong according to the TAG, because the <> URI > resolves to an XHTML document and thus <#me> cannot be a > foaf:person? That is what I understood from Alistair's early email. > I want to point out that, if that is the case, then as Mark > described, that is seriously problematic for RDF/A whose goal it is > to describe the document that is actually carrying the RDF/A itself. > > -Ben >
Received on Friday, 27 January 2006 19:05:52 UTC