Re: [ALL] RDF/A Primer Version

Mark Birbeck wrote:
> One part of the problem is that the whole point of RDF/A is to be able to
> carry metadata within a 'normal' document. This means that *by definition*
> we have what could be perceived as two resources at the same URL--we have an
> XHTML document, and we have metadata for that document. Both are 'carried'
> by the same set of XML elements, but how they are *processed* depends on the
> agent retrieving them. It seems to me that the TAG work on fragment
> identifiers does not allow for this possibility, since it says that if the
> document is XHTML, then a fragment identifier must be referring to an XML
> element. (In passing this seems wrong to me anyway, since it is supposed to
> be up to the user agent to make use of the fragment identifier.)

strong agreement. (no additional argument though!)

Jeremy