W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > January 2006

RE: [VM] TAG clarification on 302 vs 303, PURLS and more...

From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:00:21 -0500
Message-ID: <A5EEF5A4F0F0FD4DBA33093A0B075590097B67D9@tayexc18.americas.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org> 


> From: Alistair Miles
> . . .
> Ralph raised the point that simply asking OCLC to change 302 
> to 303 for all responses by the PURL server is not a 
> reasonable solution, because a 302 "Found" response code is 
> actually quite appropriate for the majority of purl.org URIs. 

Yes.  Maybe purl.org could offer registrants the choice when a URI is
registered, to indicate whether they want their URI to forward using 302
or 303.

David Booth
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 21:00:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:20 GMT