[VM]

Hi all,

David Booth suggests in point E2 [1] that for each recipe we should describe what the URIs actually return. I'd been wanting to find some way of illustrating that graphically anyway, so I added some images to recipes 1-5 illustrating the results of each configuration (see rev. 1.13 of [2]). What do you think?

Responding to point E1 [1] - how could we make the URIs shorter, given that they should actually work as described and therefore need a supporting server appropriately configured?  I'd rather leave them as is at least for the first WD publication, because the isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk server is already configured to support them.  

Cheers,

Al.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Dec/0124.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/http-examples/2005-11-18/


---
Alistair Miles
Research Associate
CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Building R1 Room 1.60
Fermi Avenue
Chilton
Didcot
Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
United Kingdom
Email:        a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440