On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 17:30 +0100, Mark van Assem wrote: > Hi again, > > > Hmm... it seems fairly reasonable; but I don't recommend computing > > the CBD on-demand. I expect "baking" will be more manageable > > than "frying". > > Ok, thanks for the suggestions. We don't know yet if we'll have a big > or small iron, but the document can stay agnostic to that issue (or at > least for the moment). Changes can be made later if we don't want to > return CBD's after all (whether or not they are baked or not), right? Yes; that sort of behind-the-scenes info is largely orthogonal to [1]. [...] > I will try to rephrase the section so that > it's made clear that both usages are possible. Great. > [1]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wn-conversion.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Thursday, 23 February 2006 16:38:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:21 GMT