- From: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 10:53:51 +0100
- To: Alistair Miles <a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk>
- CC: public-esw-thes@w3.org, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
I'm very much in favour. The more explicit the better!
Proposals of type 1 and 3 probably always occur together?
Cheers,
Mark.
Alistair Miles wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Picking up the thread of discussion relating to the 'Proposals' list ...
> I'd be quite happy to change the title of the 'Proposals' list [1] to
> 'Proposals and Issues', with the understanding that an item in this list
> may be any of the following:
>
> - A proposal for addition(s) to the SKOS Core Vocabulary, i.e. a
> proposal for new class(es), property(ies) or individual(s), in response
> to a stated requirement or issue.
>
> - A proposal for modification(s) to the formal (RDF) description of the
> SKOS Core Vocabulary, in response to a stated requirement or issue.
>
> - A proposal for addition(s) to the normative specifications of the
> SKOS Core Vocabulary, in terms of additional sections to current
> documents, or additional documents, in response to a stated requirement
> or issue.
>
> - A proposal for modification(s) to the normative specifications of the
> SKOS Core Vocabulary, in terms of modifications to section(s) of current
> documents, in response to a stated requirement or issue.
>
> - A statement of a known requirement, for which there is currently no
> proposed resolution.
>
> - A statement of a known issue, for which there is currently no
> proposed resolution.
>
> How would that be?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Al.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core/proposals
--
Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark
Received on Monday, 6 February 2006 09:54:03 UTC