- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:42:44 +0000
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- CC: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>, "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>, "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Steven Pemberton wrote: > Following on from what I believe Mark was saying at the last call, > http://example.com/foo may resolve to both an XHTML document *and* an N3 > document (and many other things) depending on the accept: headers, so > http://example.com/foo#bar could represent (many) different things. > I feel this indicates a clean view of secondary resources. A secondary resource is not a secondary resource directly derived from the primary resource, but is a secondary resource derived from a representation of the primary resource. Depending on which representation of the primary resource you get, the secondary resource varies (but when multiple representations all implement something to do with the same fragment it is reasonable to expect some coherency) Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2006 12:45:44 UTC