Re: The semantics of rdfs:label

> danbri@w3.org wrote:
>>
>> The problem I have with this, is that the Full version is somewhat
>> hidden away from crawlers and GUIs, who may not yet have the smarts
>> to understand this idiom and follow (for example) an rdfs:seeAlso from
>> the RDF you'd find at the namespace to the unexpurgated edition.
>
> Would it be better if the owl-full version was available from
> http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ and a new sub-property of seeAlso used to refer
> to the DL version for those that care. Agents that don't understand the
> property can follow the seeAlso and incorporate the OWL DL safely into the
> OWL Full version.

That would be my preference, but I'm not sure the decision should be
taken on a vocab-by-vocab basis. OWL Full systems I suspect are more
likely to be comfortable with Web crawling. I expect it wouldn't be
easy to get consensus on this, as the decision could be seen as
answering the question "which is the default/main way of using OWL,
and which is the niche interest specialist version? ...".

cheers,

Dan