W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > October 2005

RE: [MM] Contribution to the 1st deliverable

From: Jane Hunter <jane@dstc.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:25:00 +1000
Message-ID: <7AC29F67E4FED311891E009027D5F7B402B0DFE5@hqmail.dstc.edu.au>
To: "'Jacco van Ossenbruggen'" <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>, Jane Hunter <jane@dstc.edu.au>
Cc: "'Giorgos Stamou'" <gstam@softlab.ntua.gr>, "'John R Smith'" <jsmith@us.ibm.com>, raphael.troncy@isti.cnr.it, "'Christian Halaschek-Wiener'" <halasche@cs.umd.edu>, "'Nikolaos Simou'" <nsimou@image.ece.ntua.gr>, "'swick@w3.org'" <swick@w3.org>, Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacco van Ossenbruggen [mailto:Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl] 
> Sent: Thursday, 13 October 2005 5:53 PM
> To: Jane Hunter
> Cc: 'Giorgos Stamou'; 'John R Smith'; 
> raphael.troncy@isti.cnr.it; 'Christian Halaschek-Wiener'; 
> 'Nikolaos Simou'; 'swick@w3.org'; Guus Schreiber; swbp
> Subject: Re: [MM] Contribution to the 1st deliverable
> 
> 
> Jane Hunter wrote:
> 
> > Dear all,
> >  
> > Unfortunately I can't send emails to the public-swbp-wg discussion 
> > list
> 
> You just did so :-) 
> 
> ...
> 
> > - I think it would be great to have one use case that 
> involves medical
> > or scientific images. Medical images in particular are a very 
> > significant category that require domain-specific annotations e.g., 
> > mammography images?
> > Would you like me to provide a use case for this kind of collection?
> >
> Yes please!  Can you send it to me in plain text?  We agreed in 
> yesterday's teleconf that everyone should send in his contributions 
> before Monday morning Europ time, so if you can make that, than I can 
> put in the next version of the draft.
> 

I will do my best but it may have to wait till the next draft.

> > I've responded to Nikolaos' email about categorization of image
> > annotation tools.
> 
> I've missed that mail. Could send it to me again?

I included it in the list below.

> 
> > A few other suggestions:
> >  
> > 7) Collaborative or individual
> > 8) Granularity - file-based or segment-based (and sub-categories of
> > types of segmentation)
> 
> Yes, I like those.
> 
> > 9) Threaded or unthreaded
> 
> Could you elaborate on this?  Is this threaded as in "OS-level 
> multithreaded processing", a "threaded mail client" or something else?

By threaded I mean the ability to respond or add to a previous annotation
and to stagger/structure the presentation of annotations to reflect this.

Jane
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2005 23:25:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:44 UTC