W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > October 2005

RE: [VM] Skip Oct 11 telecon? (next Oct 25)?

From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:24:09 +0200
To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>, "Thomas Baker" <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Cc: "SW Best Practices" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <GOEIKOOAMJONEFCANOKCEELDGPAA.bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>


OK for me to skip to Oct 25

Bernard

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org]De la part de Dan Brickley
> Envoyé : lundi 10 octobre 2005 16:08
> À : Thomas Baker
> Cc : SW Best Practices
> Objet : Re: [VM] Skip Oct 11 telecon? (next Oct 25)?
>
>
>
> Thomas Baker wrote:
>
> >Dear all,
> >
> >The 27 Sep telecon is reported at
> >http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-vmtf-minutes.html (and in clear
> >text below).  There were two main actions:
> >
> >    1) Danbri to write up how foaf URI dereferencing
> >       works now and how it should be done.
> >
> >    2) Tom - same for DCMI.
> >
> >I have been liaising with DCMI colleagues on this and have
> >nothing to report back yet but do expect to have this before
> >Oct 25.  Dan?
> >
> >
> >
> I'm planning to rev the FOAF spec (before the Oct 25
> meeting) and to put the dereferencing documentation
> directly in there.
>
> >I would prefer to skip tomorrow's scheduled telecon and aim
> >at the next, on Tuesday, October 25 (1300 UTC/1500 Amsterdam).
> >
> >If others have progress to report and would prefer to keep to
> >the scheduled time, I could arrange to do this though, in that
> >case, I would prefer to keep the meeting to under 50 minutes.
> >
> >What do others prefer?
> >
> >
> >
> Let's skip til 25th.
>
> cheers,
>
> Dan
>
>
Received on Monday, 10 October 2005 14:24:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:44 UTC