RE: [PORT] new editor's working draft of SKOS Core Vocab Spec from Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) on 2005-10-06 (public-swbp-wg@w3.org from October 2005)

From: Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:25:43 +0100
To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0ACDA6@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk>

Hey Dan,

> 
> The negotiation is by language prefs from the browser,
> not (to be pedantic) by country, right? So a Dutch speaker
> in France can get Dutch, if they configure things properly.

Yep, depends on the 'Accept-Language:' header sent by the browser.

> One tiny edit. Instead of...
> 
> "SKOS Core is a model for expressing the structure and content of 
> concept schemes (thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading 
> lists, taxonomies, terminologies, glossaries and other types of
> controlled vocabulary)."
> 
> How about
> 
> "SKOS Core is a model for expressing the structure and content of 
> concept schemes (thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading 
> lists, taxonomies, 'folksonomies', terminologies, glossaries 
> and other 
> types of controlled vocabulary)."
> 
> If "folksonomy" proves to become a dated buzzword, we can 
> remove it in a 
> later version. Would be good for W3C to go on record as 
> asserting SKOS's 
> relevant there, though. In the Guide too, and other 
> occurances of this 
> abstract.

I'm happy to add this.

Cheers,

Al.

Received on Thursday, 6 October 2005 17:25:53 UTC